ThatguyPhil Posted March 18, 2016 Hey all, just a quick question. Where did Sean go? He was a great addition to the podcast but I never hear him mentioned anymore. Is he more behind the scenes or is he working on something else? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
melmer Posted March 18, 2016 Sean's up his own arse Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ozzie Posted March 18, 2016 He got lost in the woods. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bjorn Posted March 18, 2016 I wanna see a "Where's Sean Vanaman" in the vein of "Where in the World is Carmen Sandiego?" gamejam. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ThatguyPhil Posted March 18, 2016 Sean's up his own arse care to explain? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ThatguyPhil Posted March 18, 2016 I wanna see a "Where's Sean Vanaman" in the vein of "Where in the World is Carmen Sandiego?" gamejam. He's the end boss battle, turns out he was a Big Dog the whole time. An M. Night Shyamalamadingdong twist. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
sclpls Posted March 18, 2016 He's living that hobo indie dev lifestyle and making games on trains. https://bburbank.itch.io/discharge Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
tberton Posted March 19, 2016 Sean Vanaman is inside all of us, now. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
gregbrown Posted March 19, 2016 Sean Vanaman is inside all of us, now. The philosophical school of thought known as "Sean Panaman." Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Patrick R Posted March 19, 2016 He was on a train recently. Maybe he's still on that train. Maybe he's one of those train guys now, who lives on trains, and tries to start up conversations with other people about trains. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
elmuerte Posted March 19, 2016 So, he's experiencing groundhog day on the last express? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Vainamoinen Posted March 19, 2016 He's still on that mission. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
WickedCestus Posted March 19, 2016 Re-writing Firewatch. This time as a Sleep No More-style theatre production set across the entirety of Yellowstone National Park. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
thenexus6 Posted March 20, 2016 We are all Sean Vanaman. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Erkki Posted March 20, 2016 Zoom in to Sean Vanaman. Enhance. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
hyretic Posted March 25, 2016 Sean just posted this on Twitter. I really miss him being on the podcast, but I thought chances are he wasn't on it because he just plain didn't want to be on it anymore. However, he seems to think that the show is better without him and that's just so wrong. Let's see what the readers feel like. Strawpoll. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Patrick R Posted March 25, 2016 I dunno. I really miss Sean being on the podcast but there are an incalculable number of personal things that could have lead to him not wanting to be on the podcast right now or anymore. If there hasn't been an announcement and nothing's been made official then that probably means he doesn't really want to get into it, and that's his right. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
hyretic Posted March 25, 2016 I dunno. I really miss Sean being on the podcast but there are an incalculable number of personal things that could have lead to him not wanting to be on the podcast right now or anymore. If there hasn't been an announcement and nothing's been made official then that probably means he doesn't really want to get into it, and that's his right. I thought the same thing prior to his tweet, but that seems to indicate it's not a personal issue but a podcast quality issue, and I think the readers' opinion on that is valid. Besides, he's perfectly capable of ignoring this if he wants to. I don't think we're hurting anyone by showing that we actually care that he isn't on the podcast anymore. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Chris Posted March 25, 2016 We have been trying to pare down the show recently to very rarely be more than three people. (Special cases like someone being in from out of town for GDC or whatever are exceptions.) This isn't detail I was planning on sharing, but whatever, it's not really that big a deal: Idle Thumbs lost a LOT of listeners when the cast of the show grew too big and we turned into sort of a weekly game of musical chairs. I am strongly convinced that this is not because of the presence or lack of any particular combination of people, but rather because the changing combination of people made the show unpredictable and inconsistent from week to week. Not necessarily inconsistent in terms of end quality of each individual episode, but inconsistent in terms of tone and listener expectation. I don't imagine this hurt the show much for people here on the forums, since you folks know us all really well relatively speaking, but I think the larger listening audience, especially people who haven't been listening as long, would just kind of lose interest over time when it seemed like they didn't know which version of the show they were going to get week by week. We also think it's conversationally manageable with three people, and gets really tough with four (and especially five). We have such an unstructured style, with lots of interruptions and cross-talk, that when you go above three, things get dicey--again, probably not as big a deal for the longtime hardcore listeners, but I think often very frustrating and difficult to parse for many. Once you have four people, you're in the zone when you can have two different parallel small conversations, and that is the absolute worst. It also kind of sucked for me to have to deal with scheduling a different group of people each week, where people who weren't me and Jake could basically decide arbitrarily whether they were going to be on or not; that's just inevitably how free-time projects end up if you don't have a really strong requirement that a specific group of people always show up. So it has made things much easier to just assume "Okay, this group of three is going to be on every week, and if someone absolutely cannot make it, we'll figure out a sub." I am completely certain that Sean will still end up on episodes. In terms of the default week to week configuration it has just made it a way less hectic show to have a consistent group. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Twig Posted March 25, 2016 So... we're never gonna have a sevener is what you're saying. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
hyretic Posted March 25, 2016 Wow. I can't pretend it's not pretty gutting that my favourite host was dropped for that reason, but I appreciate you explaining the situation anyway Chris. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ozzie Posted March 25, 2016 It's too bad Idle Thumbs lost listeners over it, because I thought the unpredictability of the cast from week to week was rather exciting. It was a strong period of the 'cast during that time. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SecretAsianMan Posted March 25, 2016 As one of those longtime hardcore listeners readers, I'll say that the loose structure of Idle Thumbs is one of the things that endears it to me. It feels more like a conversation among friends than a "show" which in a way makes me feel more included, as though I were sitting in the same room but not saying much. I enjoyed the expanding and rotating cast as it made things feel fresh but still maintained what I loved about the podcast. That said, I completely understand what Chris said. I look forward to hearing from Sean again. Maybe I can entice him with candy. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gormongous Posted March 25, 2016 As one of those longtime hardcore listeners readers, I'll say that the loose structure of Idle Thumbs is one of the things that endears it to me. It feels more like a conversation among friends than a "show" which in a way makes me feel more included, as though I were sitting in the same room but not saying much. I enjoyed the expanding and rotating cast as it made things feel fresh but still maintained what I loved about the podcast. That said, I completely understand what Chris said. I look forward to hearing from Sean again. Maybe I can entice him with candy. Yeah, I had figured that the chaos of the four- and five-person episodes was part of why Sean hasn't been around, but it's a real shame. I don't know the numbers, but I think that the four-person episodes of Chris, Jake, Steve, and Sean near the end of the second run are maybe the best episodes of video game podcasting ever made, and a big part of that is Sean, with his Skipper Croft and his Snoopy Flying Ace. The past twenty or thirty episodes, I've really missed his voice, and I hope that circumstances conspire to get him back on the podcast soon. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
feelthedarkness Posted March 25, 2016 sounds like Idle Weekend needs its THIRD. also, i want more gaynor podcasting however i have to get it! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites