Jump to content
Merus

Ferguson

Recommended Posts

The earliest CIA action I can think of off hand is... overthrowing governments...? So yeah, pretty much.

 

And the FBI has its roots in the Pinkertons, a nineteenth-century for-hire private army best known for strike-breaking. Yay, government!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And the FBI has its roots in the Pinkertons, a nineteenth-century for-hire private army best known for strike-breaking. Yay, government!

 

The Secret Service assisted in rounding up of Japanese Americans for internment in WW2. Modern SWAT teams are descended from the union busting efforts of California cops in the '60s. The postal inspection service (the police arm of the post office) has a storied career of oppression and harassment (see Comstock).

I don't know that the Park Police has ever been part of the systemic oppression of anyone. So yah national parks?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know that the Park Police has ever been part of the systemic oppression of anyone. So yah national parks?

Arsonists are people, too! )':

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That police is supposed to solve crime and protect the people is a clever bit of propaganda. The purpose of the police is to hunt for code violations and enforce property rights.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I remember listening to the audiobook of Legacy of Ashes: The History of the CIA, and it was just like listening to a 19 hour Aristocrats joke, with war crimes replacing sex acts.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Today in Oakland a protest blockaded the entrance to the Oakland Police Department. On the net this is represented by the hashtag #shutdownOPD

 

And frankly I approve; I really hope that part of their demand is that Jean Quan steps down as mayor, as she's one of the biggest voices in the country in favor of militarizing the police and allowing the status quo to continue. The OPD needs to be disarmed, along with that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Also this happened and just kinda put a punctuation point on the whole thing. I forgot to mention that the Oakland PD is like the LAPD in that they're super trigger-happy.

 


B49gLvlCUAAsbgW.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's awesome.  Is that a picture of someone hanging it, or taking it down?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's awesome.  Is that a picture of someone hanging it, or taking it down?

Hanging it up. I'm putting the image on a thumb drive and taking it to work so I can make it into a poster.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I didn't read through the whole Smoking Gun piece, but this Slate article says that her testimony was questioned and undermined by prosecutors during the Grand Jury.

Slate acts like that makes it case closed, nothing-to-see-here, move along. But wait, why the fuck would a prosecutor ever put her in front of a grand jury at all then? To confuse and overwhelm them with too much information, too many viewpoints, to make the entire thing muddled.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Slate acts like that makes it case closed, nothing-to-see-here, move along. But wait, why the fuck would a prosecutor ever put her in front of a grand jury at all then? To confuse and overwhelm them with too much information, too many viewpoints, to make the entire thing muddled.

McCulloch said in a recent interview that he made the deliberate decision to present the grand jury with testimony from witnesses he knew had lied and were lying. He frames this decision as his professional duty to make sure everyone's stories got heard: http://www.buzzfeed.com/mikehayes/st-louis-prosecutor-says-he-knew-witnesses-lied

He also says that he has no intention of charging said witnesses with perjury, because of reasons. I admit, I have no clue anymore what it means to be a lawyer, let alone district attorney.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Isn't knowingly putting a lying witness on the stand prosecutorial misconduct and grounds for disbarment? Like, that's basic lawyering 101.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Isn't knowingly putting a lying witness on the stand prosecutorial misconduct and grounds for disbarment? Like, that's basic lawyering 101.

Yep, it's apparently called subornation of perjury: http://www.justice.gov/usao/eousa/foia_reading_room/usam/title9/crm01752.htm

McCulloch openly admitted in his interview to four of the five particulars needed to convict him of that charge; the only thing missing is explicit evidence that he knew ahead of time that the witness was going to lie. McCulloch has risen into the public view so rapidly, I'm having a hard time telling if he's one of the most corrupt public officials I've ever seen or just one of the most incompetent. Or both!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Given my many conversations with a close friend who's a prosecutor, here's an even more concerning thought: Is McCulloch just your average DA facing a case where he has to justify his shitty decisions on a larger scale than usual?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What about losing a grand jury against a cop? (I'm asking legitimately, if that's not clear.)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What about losing a grand jury against a cop? (I'm asking legitimately, if that's not clear.)

 

No, that's super common. It's basically the norm.

 

 

Yep, it's apparently called subornation of perjury: http://www.justice.gov/usao/eousa/foia_reading_room/usam/title9/crm01752.htm

McCulloch openly admitted in his interview to four of the five particulars needed to convict him of that charge; the only thing missing is explicit evidence that he knew ahead of time that the witness was going to lie. McCulloch has risen into the public view so rapidly, I'm having a hard time telling if he's one of the most corrupt public officials I've ever seen or just one of the most incompetent. Or both!

 

I think you have to go with both. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No, that's super common. It's basically the norm.

Okay, that's sort of what I figured would be the case.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The McCulloch situation reminds me of a story a buddy of mine in the military likes to tell about something he refers to as "stand by to stand by". When the troops would be mustered, he would have to arrive something like 4 hours early and just stand around. He explained the reason for this is that no one wanted to get in trouble because someone was late. So when the department of the army set the muster time, each successive rung of the hierarchy would push it forward by half an hour or so with the end result being hours of waiting. Looking at everything McCulloch either did or was complicit in to me just seems like he was trying to absolve himself of as much responsibility as possible, from both the public and the police with little interest in doing his job well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The police shot and killed another black teenager, Antonio Martin, two miles from Ferguson last night. Eyewitnesses describe how he was breathing after he'd been shot but was left to die on the ground for half an hour with no medical attention. He's already being smeared by the media as a gun toting monster. Lots on Twitter:

https://twitter.com/hashtag/AntonioMartin?src=hash

 

About a week ago, at a Police charity event in LA the guests all sang a racist song crowing over the death of Michael Brown. The venue condemned it, and the organising officer defended it by saying "This is America".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×