Stuart Posted January 20, 2014 Splinter Cell: Chaos Theory is Clint Hawking's masterpiece, not Far Cry 2. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Zeusthecat Posted January 20, 2014 We have these automatic soap dispensers in the restroom at my work that make me feel like my hands are being ejaculated on every time I wash them. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
tegan Posted January 20, 2014 We have these automatic soap dispensers in the restroom at my work that make me feel like my hands are being ejaculated on every time I wash them. When the Blockbuster I used to work for closed down, I took the entire store supply of that weird pearlescent pink industrial restroom handsoap. I haven't bought handsoap in two and a half years. I'm still good for at least another two. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Zeusthecat Posted January 21, 2014 Fresh and Easy is my favorite grocery store ever. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dibs Posted January 21, 2014 You sure it's not just a gloryhole? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Zeusthecat Posted January 21, 2014 It is the one glory hole to rule them all, one glory hole to find them, one glory hole to bring them all and in the darkness bind them. And by "them" I mean penises of course. Okay, I'll stop now. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
subbes Posted January 21, 2014 something something rat trap in a glory hole something something Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Zeusthecat Posted January 21, 2014 Is Wikipedia still considered an unreliable source of information? I recall all of my professors in college not allowing students to use Wikipedia references in papers because any nutjob could put whatever false information they wanted up there. Honestly though, I can't think of a single instance where I read something on Wikipedia that turned out to be incorrect. I'm sure it happens, I just think it is interesting that the truth seems to have mostly prevailed despite the fears many people had. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
subbes Posted January 21, 2014 Wikipedia is not considered a reliable source of information for research papers and scholarly works, no. It can, however, be a good starting point for such things if you're only held to an UG standard - hit the "References" and you'll probably find your way to a good vein of academic/peer reviewed sources more appropriate for such purposes. Qualifications: I have an MS in Library Science which included study of information gathering and expected/actual research behaviors amongst undergraduate students. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gormongous Posted January 21, 2014 Is Wikipedia still considered an unreliable source of information? I recall all of my professors in college not allowing students to use Wikipedia references in papers because any nutjob could put whatever false information they wanted up there. Honestly though, I can't think of a single instance where I read something on Wikipedia that turned out to be incorrect. I'm sure it happens, I just think it is interesting that the truth seems to have mostly prevailed despite the fears many people had. At least in my own field, Wikipedia is not often wrong, per se, but it's not a good source for two reasons: i) its rules for notability predispose it towards older obsolete scholarship that is widely available, and ii) its web-based nature predisposes it towards sources that are freely accessible online. Therefore, if you're lucky, you're getting the hottest research from 1964 on the marquisate of Montferrat, but if you're unlucky, you're reading the 1911 Britannica or Catholic Encyclopedia entry that's the only thing out of copyright. Even in my professional work, I use Wikipedia for names, dates, and places, but I would never take as given any sort of thesis I found there. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Twig Posted January 21, 2014 "Library Science" sounds way too awesome and I don't want to know the reality of what it actually is so I didn't finish reading that sentence. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
subbes Posted January 21, 2014 I know how to repair a book binding! Or I did until I forgot. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Zeusthecat Posted January 21, 2014 At least in my own field, Wikipedia is not often wrong, per se, but it's not a good source for two reasons: i) its rules for notability predispose it towards older obsolete scholarship that is widely available, and ii) its web-based nature predisposes it towards sources that are freely accessible online. Therefore, if you're lucky, you're getting the hottest research from 1964 on the marquisate of Montferrat, but if you're unlucky, you're reading the 1911 Britannica or Catholic Encyclopedia entry that's the only thing out of copyright. Even in my professional work, I use Wikipedia for names, dates, and places, but I would never take as given any sort of thesis I found there. I can definitely understand the inherent limitations that you mention and don't mean to imply that it is accurate or exhaustive enough to provide all of the information one would need on a topic, especially for academic purposes. I'm just surprised that in the wretched hive of scum and villainy that is the internet, that it has managed to maintain the level of accuracy that it has without completely succumbing to the countless shitheads out there. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
subbes Posted January 21, 2014 Wikipedia admins are their own special brand of shithead. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
osmosisch Posted January 21, 2014 also, have you tried tales of maj'ejal? you should.Everyone should. It's my favourite current roguelike by a country mile. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gormongous Posted January 21, 2014 I can definitely understand the inherent limitations that you mention and don't mean to imply that it is accurate or exhaustive enough to provide all of the information one would need on a topic, especially for academic purposes. I'm just surprised that in the wretched hive of scum and villainy that is the internet, that it has managed to maintain the level of accuracy that it has without completely succumbing to the countless shitheads out there. Well, if there's one thing for which the internet is good, it's nitpicking over facts. Wikipedia represents the best of that. But still (and sadly) you're probably better picking up a couple books on the topic from your library if you're looking for any sort of depth. And that's not to mention the weird nationalism that's all over any article pertaining to the Balkans and other fractious regions. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Zeusthecat Posted January 22, 2014 There is something that's always bothered me about the Buu saga in DragonballZ. First, fat Buu is conjured up and he's all wacky and dangerous. Then, due to the heroic acts of Mister Satan, fat Buu decides he wants to be good and expels the bad part of himself who ends up taking form as a skinny, gray Buu. Then they fight and evil Buu turns fat Buu into a cookie and eats him. This makes evil Buu turn pink and get super strong. Then evil Buu absorbs various heroes and eventually ends up with Goku and Vegeta fighting their way through his innards. As they are freeing the other heroes from Buu's insides, they notice fat Buu and he ends up getting freed too. Then, instead of turning back into gray Buu he turns into kid Buu and he is now the most powerful being in the universe. That shit makes no sense. Either fat Buu should have originally spewed out kid Buu, or evil, pink Buu should have turned back into gray Buu when fat Buu was freed. I'm pretty sure what they did violates the second law of thermodynamics. Also, how much fucking acid was Akira Toriyama consuming when he came up with this shit? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SecretAsianMan Posted January 22, 2014 I think DBZ should have ended after the Cell saga. It always bothered me that Goku was always the one who ends up saving the day. Why bother having a cast of super powerful characters when you really only need one to do fucking everything. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Zeusthecat Posted January 22, 2014 Yeah, I totally agree. The Cell Saga was my favorite piece of DragonBallZ content alongside the Saiyan Saga. I definitely tended to like the series best when all the other fighters actually contributed too. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Twig Posted January 22, 2014 Toriyama also thinks DBZ should have ended after the Cell saga. As I recall. I think DBZ should've ended before it began, and DB should've ended before Goku got tall. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Zeusthecat Posted January 22, 2014 Toriyama also thinks DBZ should have ended after the Cell saga. As I recall. I think DBZ should've ended before it began, and DB should've ended before Goku got tall. Awww, come on. Then we would have never had Gohan. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Twig Posted January 22, 2014 Gohan is complete and utter shit compared to young Goku, in every imaginable way. YOU HEAR ME DRAGONBALL Z YOU SUCK Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ucantalas Posted January 22, 2014 But without DBZ we never would have had Frieza! And Vegeta! TRUNKS! CELL!(And teenage me would not have had Android 18... That sentence shall speak for itself and I will not speak further about it.) (Although, with the differences in tone and feel between DB and DBZ, I probably would have been fine with DBZ if it hadn't had anything to do with DB and had been its own series entirely. I still enjoyed it enough that I wouldn't want it to have not existed entirely.) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Twig Posted January 22, 2014 I mean I loved DBZ when I was a kid so obviously I don't actually want it not to have existed. But it's vastly inferior in my mind. I already went over a lot of this at one point in the anime thread because I tasked myself with watching the entire franchise with a friend. We sort of stopped at the beginning of the Cell saga because it was so boring. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Zeusthecat Posted January 22, 2014 THANK YOU! (except the Android 18 part, robots aren't to be trusted) Edit: Not to you Twig, to Ucantalas. Although DB was pretty damn good. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites