tegan Posted June 26, 2014 It's not the lack of limbs for me, it's his ugly face and stupid hair. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
N1njaSquirrel Posted June 26, 2014 His hair is totally rad. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bjorn Posted June 26, 2014 Rayman is rad, any other opinion is objectively wrong. If you were to time travel back to the 80s, the birth of all that is rad, and ask people if Rayman is rad, people would 100 percent confirm his radness. I don't know how much the rest of you know about being rad (I'm an expert). Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
N1njaSquirrel Posted June 26, 2014 Whilst I agree that rayman is rad, 100% of people in the 80's would say 'who's rayman?', before turning up David Bowie on their Jukebox and rollerblade away, as rayman was created in 95. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JonCole Posted June 26, 2014 Radness transcends time and space Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bjorn Posted June 26, 2014 Whilst I agree that rayman is rad, 100% of people in the 80's would say 'who's rayman?', before turning up David Bowie on their Jukebox and rollerblade away, as rayman was created in 95. I think you missed the part where I said time machine. I would be taking back rad examples of Rayman to show them, which would inherently be seen as rad. I thought this out. The logic is flawless. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Twig Posted June 26, 2014 Rayman? More like Radman! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Griddlelol Posted June 26, 2014 My opinion is the same as Tegan's. It's his face. He looks like a malformed duck with stupid hair. The lack of limbs just compounds the problem, not only is he ugly as sin, he also makes no logical sense. I seriously can't think of a video game character more grotesque than Rayman. You're welcome to provide examples, but they'll all be wrong. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bjorn Posted June 26, 2014 Rayman? More like Radman! The Google image search for Radman is fascinating. My opinion is the same as Tegan's. It's his face. He looks like a malformed duck with stupid hair. The lack of limbs just compounds the problem, not only is he ugly as sin, he also makes no logical sense. I seriously can't think of a video game character more grotesque than Rayman. You're welcome to provide examples, but they'll all be wrong. Tingle. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Twig Posted June 26, 2014 I'm sorry I was with you up until now Bjorn.Don't ever insult Tingle again. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Griddlelol Posted June 26, 2014 Tingle isn't grotesque. He's just creepy. Guess who's not there in your search for radman? The Internet has spoken. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bjorn Posted June 26, 2014 I'm sorry I was with you up until now Bjorn. Don't ever insult Tingle again. To be fair, I haven't played a Zelda game since a Link to the Past. So I've never seen Tingle in action. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
N1njaSquirrel Posted June 26, 2014 I think you missed the part where I said time machine. I would be taking back rad examples of Rayman to show them, which would inherently be seen as rad. I thought this out. The logic is flawless. No, no, no, dear Bjorn, you've gotten it all wrong, what I believe you said was 'time travel'. There was no mention of a time machine. Time travel does not always require a device for which you need to travel back in time, as shown here in the wikipedia article for time travel: "Non-technological forms of time travel had appeared in a number of earlier stories such as Charles Dickens' A Christmas Carol." I put it to you that you could have easily traveled back in time without the means of a time machine! Your message could have easily been misinterpreted by the defendant thinking that you'd be merely reminiscing of when you yourself lived as a child of the 80's! If anything, I find not only your logic, but your claims to being a rad expert unfounded! But Rayman is still rad... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Thrik Posted June 26, 2014 Rayman is just a Moomin with invisible body parts. Seems pretty weird to me to have such an extreme opinion of the design and refuse to play — especially when the game is otherwise beautiful beyond measure. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JonCole Posted June 26, 2014 Rayman is just a Moomin with invisible body parts. Seems pretty weird to me to have such an extreme opinion of the design and refuse to play — especially when the game is otherwise beautiful beyond measure, Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
tegan Posted June 26, 2014 Those games are otherwise pretty, but I also find Rayman platforming really floaty and slippery, which is my primary reason for not playing those games. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Griddlelol Posted June 26, 2014 Are you saying you've never avoided a game because you didn't like the art style? Also people seem to take what I say a little too seriously. It sounds like I have an extremely strong opinion on the matter, but I'm exaggerating quite a lot! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Twig Posted June 26, 2014 I wish anyone who ever has worked on, is working on, or will work on the Rayman property would die a horrible and painful death for allowing that grotesque monstrosity to exist in any fashion. wow griddlelol you sure do have extreme opinions on this subject ): Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
syntheticgerbil Posted June 26, 2014 I'd say the radness factor of his 90s design, stemming from that awful Amiga look of using all colors, was completely abandoned in favor of a better design in 2. Those games are otherwise pretty, but I also find Rayman platforming really floaty and slippery, which is my primary reason for not playing those games. Which game? They are all competely different. Anyway, every major Rayman game except for 3 is solid platforming. 3 is great too, it just doesn't measure up to other installments. Rayman 2 was the best platformer on 64 (and Dreamcast), not that frustrating and often tedious Mario 64 game. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
undermind9 Posted June 27, 2014 EBay had their Mario bundle up for 250 again... By the time I had emailed my wife to drop a late bday gift hint it had already sold out Good sign I suppose, bad for a deal seeker on the wiiu cusp Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Merus Posted June 27, 2014 That's cool. You can just play as this adorable guy instead: Or you could play as the SPY PRINCESS THERE IS A SPY PRINCESS SHE HAS GOGO BOOTS AND A TRIDENT Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
miffy495 Posted June 27, 2014 Yeah, within like 5 seconds of starting the game, it offered me the chance to switch characters. Also, I like Rayman anyway. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Twig Posted June 27, 2014 Who doesn't like Rayman? He's rad! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Griddlelol Posted June 27, 2014 wow griddlelol you sure do have extreme opinions on this subject ): I think you took me out of context there. I played the demo last night, it's actually a pretty rad game. Seemed pretty easy though. The challenge was in collecting things through the level, but even that wasn't particularly hard. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites