Forbin Posted January 16, 2011 Advancements on the cyborg front. http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/15/man-discovers-glasses-free-3d-tech-in-the-blink-of-an-eye-video/ Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ThunderPeel2001 Posted January 16, 2011 That's insane. Uef17zOCDb8 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Thompson Posted January 17, 2011 That's terrifying. I refuse to believe that that could possibly be real, so how is it faked? That's some pretty good eyelid CGI. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jake Posted January 17, 2011 That video is fake. Look up the authors name or more about tue video and you'll see that he's a video/performance artist of some kind. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ThunderPeel2001 Posted January 17, 2011 That video is fake. Look up the authors name or more about tue video and you'll see that he's a video/performance artist of some kind. Doesn't surprise me, it was extremely well shot for a "home" movie. (You shot coverage? Come on!). Weird stuff though, and otherwise extremely well done! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
toblix Posted January 17, 2011 Fake in what way? That he's not actually seeing 3D? I thought it was meant to be a joke, and that this was obvious ... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ThunderPeel2001 Posted January 17, 2011 Fake in what way? That he's not actually seeing 3D? I thought it was meant to be a joke, and that this was obvious ... Well I'd agree with you that it seems absurd... but his eyelids! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
toblix Posted January 17, 2011 Yeah. It would definitely be possible to do 3D this way, providing: the blinking doesn't trigger a focus change in the eye, and the blinking is fast enough and synchronized properly with the display I viewed it as a joke, though, and a good opportunity to put those electronic muscle things on your face. I've tried this myself, using a therapy machine thing my parents have, and put an electrode on each temple. It was horrible. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ThunderPeel2001 Posted January 17, 2011 I viewed it as a joke, though, and a good opportunity to put those electronic muscle things on your face. I've tried this myself, using a therapy machine thing my parents have, and put an electrode on each temple. It was horrible. Ah. I'd never seen that technology before. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
James Posted January 17, 2011 Yeah. It would definitely be possible to do 3D this way, providing: the blinking doesn't trigger a focus change in the eye, and the blinking is fast enough and synchronized properly with the display I can see there being a problem with the time it takes for each eye to open and close. Wouldn't it be very flickery? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
toblix Posted January 17, 2011 I assume it would be terrible, and not by any means useful for anything, but I still think it might just work. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Quanta Posted January 17, 2011 Uef17zOCDb8 This looks (no pun intended) like an effective way to induce a ptosis (fig. 1: ). Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
James Posted January 17, 2011 I assume it would be terrible, and not by any means useful for anything, but I still think it might just work. Then we're agreed: it might work, but not well. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Armchair General Posted January 19, 2011 It wouldn't work. The muscles which supply the eye would fatigue. Try doing it yourself as fast as you can. After a minute or so the rate slows until eventually it slows to a near stop. Levator palpebrae superioiris (the muscle that opens the lids) would be a type IIb fibre which are very fatiguable. Orbicularis oculi (which closes the lids) is probably a type IIx; not quite so fatiguable but still fairly fatiguable.(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skeletal_muscle) Also, the area that the electrodes are placed would mean he contracts the temporalis muscle which would result in him clenching his jaw. It's definitely a fake, and a bad one at that, HARUMPH. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
toblix Posted January 19, 2011 What is this, amateur hour? If you knew the first thing about the sympathetic nervous system you would see that the electrodes are placed on the myoblastic rim of the superior tarsal muscle ("sulcus subtarsalis"), and would stimulate the ophthalmic artery, thus avoiding IIx (Ix) fatigue ("Müller's fatigue"). This is basic myotome embryology. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Armchair General Posted January 19, 2011 HAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Very good Blix, very good. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ThunderPeel2001 Posted January 19, 2011 HAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Very good Blix, very good. Sure, laugh it up, "doctor". (Another phoney exposed by Toblix PI!) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Forbin Posted January 21, 2011 What is this, amateur hour? If you knew the first thing about the sympathetic nervous system you would see that the electrodes are placed on the myoblastic rim of the superior tarsal muscle ("sulcus subtarsalis"), and would stimulate the ophthalmic artery, thus avoiding IIx (Ix) fatigue ("Müller's fatigue"). This is basic myotome embryology. unfortunately we wouldn't even be considered "amateur" optomitrists. But it is still a good video. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Quanta Posted January 21, 2011 unfortunately we wouldn't even be considered "amateur" optomitrists. Optomitrists? Are these the ones with that disconcerting procedure where they grab your eyeballs and tell you to cough? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ThunderPeel2001 Posted January 21, 2011 Optomitrists? Are these the ones with that disconcerting procedure where they grab your eyeballs and tell you to cough? No, optomitrists are the ones who are always perky and happy. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Thompson Posted January 22, 2011 You guys need an ophthalmologist in here, just to confuse things more. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
toblix Posted January 23, 2011 http://www.i-programmer.info/news/105-artificial-intelligence/1895-artificial-retinas-see-well-enough-to-balance-a-pencil.html Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
James Posted January 24, 2011 I can't describe how excited I was to see a photo of Big Dogs in one of the "The Truth" segments in Assassin's Creed: Brotherhood. Actually, I can, thus: I was quite excited. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
doodle_robot Posted January 26, 2011 THIS!! is happening!! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites