
A continuation of Assassin's Creed: Mohawk thread
http://www.idlethumb...d-mohawk/page-1
Posted 07 March 2013 - 06:54 PM
Posted 07 March 2013 - 07:09 PM
Posted 07 March 2013 - 08:16 PM
Posted 07 March 2013 - 09:21 PM
Posted 07 March 2013 - 09:33 PM
Presumably this is a mobile game to set up Abstergo Entertainment, which Ubisoft claimed in their press conference for Assassin's Creed IV is a real-world company that you, as the player, will be working for by using your console-animus to play their games?
Or not, but I just wanted to bring that up again, from the RPS article. Someone at Ubi really really really loves the near-future conspiracy shit.
Posted 07 March 2013 - 09:51 PM
Posted 07 March 2013 - 09:52 PM
Posted 08 March 2013 - 02:38 AM
Liberation on Vita was centred around the conceit that the animus had become recreational software and that you could purchase different people's histories from Abstergo to play. It followed through on it pretty hard too, up to including "hacks" from some assassin coder who would show you the part that Abstergo "edited out" of their software if you found certain NPCs and killed them. AC is weird.
Posted 08 March 2013 - 08:41 AM
Posted 08 March 2013 - 08:48 AM
Unfortunately someone at UbiSoft clearly thinks it warrants being more than that.
I have to admit, I am more curious about who this is than any mystery the Assassin's Creed games have managed to conjure up.
Who fought against Desmond's unpopularity year after year, game after game? Who made the decision to increase the number of near-future scenes in Revelations? Are they responsible for the fiction or are they simply fans of it? Are they one or many? What are their positions at Ubisoft? Do they have a plan? THIS IS THE CONSPIRACY THEORY THAT INTERESTS ME.
Posted 11 March 2013 - 11:20 PM
AC is basically a mix of really well-researched and beautiful historical fiction combined with truly bad sci-fi. I was originally OK with it because it provided an excuse for some useful/cool gameplay and UI stuff. Unfortunately someone at UbiSoft clearly thinks it warrants being more than that.
That's a pretty solid critique of that series in general IMO. However I'm not entirely sure that the sci fi stuff ads any cool game play elements. All the dumb sci fi story really does for the game is couch the UI elements and collectibles inside that section of the worlds ridiculous fiction.
Posted 12 March 2013 - 12:46 AM
I'm calling it right now as a game that disappoints versus hype thanks to not enough time/money.
Yes, I know that they actually spent 3 years on it, yes I know they have a huge budget. But they're promising something along the scale of Red Dead Redemption/GTA V without spending a hundred+ million and 5+ years on it. So I just don't see them delivering, and all to keep their artificial money making schedule.
Zeus I'm cynical. Maybe I should go back to playing Rollercoaster Tycoon 2. Making a make believe theme park can at least cure part of that temporarily.
Posted 12 March 2013 - 01:11 AM
All the dumb sci fi story really does for the game is couch the UI elements and collectibles inside that section of the worlds ridiculous fiction.
This makes me want to think that Far Cry 3 takes place in some sort of animus not only because of the invasive AI, but the tone early on that made it seem like there was something like 'The Game' going on.
In any case, the only thing I found really compelling about AC3 was running around as a Native American kid in the forest. During that all too brief period, the aesthetics enhanced the experience of retreaded AC mechanics. Hopefully I'll be able to just sail around in AC: BF and just be a sailor.
Posted 12 March 2013 - 09:25 AM
I think to think this will be anything but more Assassins Creed is sort of foolish. We're now 5 (will this be 6?) games into the series. I think what you're going to get from AC has become pretty clear. I wonder how bad sales will need to get before they consider shelving the franchise for a while?
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users