Spaff Posted August 23, 2007 http://www.news.com.au/story/0,23599,22289183-2,00.html?from=public_rss oh noes gingar. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DanJW Posted August 23, 2007 Oh wow. That article shows amazing ignorance of the genetics involved. I'm surprised at the National Geographic. Fact is, most red-hair genes are recessive. While this means they are repressed in the presence of dark-hair genes, it also means that the gene itself is almost impossible to irradicate - too many non-ginger people will unknowingly be carrying a ginger gene. This means that now and again a red head will pop up, even to non-ginger parents. This doesn't even take into account the possibility of new ginger genes coming into existence by mutation (it's only a very minor mutation after all). Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Spaff Posted August 23, 2007 it also doesnt take into effect the ethnic cleanisng of gingers that will take place in 2043 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Roderick Posted August 23, 2007 Or the ginger restoration breeding programme of 2057. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DanJW Posted August 23, 2007 Or the conversion of the United States into a ginger-worshipping isolated biodome (I forget the date that happened. It was probably gradual anyway). Share this post Link to post Share on other sites