Nick Posted January 17, 2005 Saw this in the paper at the pub on Bob's birthday and thought it was too good not to share. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/4174519.stm Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Marek Posted January 17, 2005 All that shit needs to be added in C&C: Generals. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bc9b Posted January 17, 2005 Those wepons, especually the gay bomb, would of been very weird if they started to be sold illigally. Very weird. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MrHoatzin Posted January 17, 2005 Just goes to show you how vapid the conservative mind is when the most horrific new weapon they can think of is supposed to faggify the enemy. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lailoken Posted January 17, 2005 well i suppose they came up with the most intimidating weapon in human history and they called it <little finger rising to lips> the gay bomb... just imagine, what could be any more terrifying then being gay in the army!!!! but if they were going to fight muslims that might have been quite an insight, which i am unwilling to give them credit for! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Salka Posted January 17, 2005 Oh man, ha ha ha, that would be hilarious. That would be so good. I'd love to set off Gay Bombs all along the Bible Belt of the US. I'm laughing so hard just thinking about it that I'm crying. That would be awesome. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MrHoatzin Posted January 17, 2005 but if they were going to fight muslims that might have been quite an insight, which i am unwilling to give them credit for!Actually, I beg to differ. In countries where you never see a woman that is not your immediate family, how do you think hormone-a-plenty boys find release? It ought to be a far smaller taboo than it is in Bible Belts world-over. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lailoken Posted January 17, 2005 well i guess we could argue about that one... i don't think that the veiling of women is an expression of a highly homosexual society... but then i guess i could be wrong, i mean look at the catholic church.... there are probably both sides to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MrHoatzin Posted January 18, 2005 well i guess we could argue about that one... i don't think that the veiling of women is an expression of a highly homosexual society... but then i guess i could be wrong, i mean look at the catholic church.... there are probably both sides to thisI don't think it has anything to do with homosexuality par se... I mean, wanting to fuck men and being in love with men are two different things. Likewisely, I don't think they're queer so they hide their women; I think their women are hidden and forbidden so they fuck each other. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bc9b Posted January 18, 2005 It's called chastity, man. They aren't all gay. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Erwin_Br Posted January 18, 2005 I don't think it has anything to do with homosexuality par se... I mean, wanting to fuck men and being in love with men are two different things. I thought the whole concept was to make these men want to fuck so badly, they won't be able to focus on the battle and hump anything in sight, whether that's a camel or a fellow soldier. At least, that's what I heard on the news here. They didn't say anything about turning men gay or something. --Erwin Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
