Saw this yesterday, made me chuckle.
I hope this isnt some pathetic subconscious attempt of mine to pander, but I think this is an interesting retort considering the topic.
I would even go so far as to say what I wrote could possibly be written by a computer sometime in the future, whereas your answer could not.
1)You are not only questioning my theory of human intellect being fundamentally superior to anything devised of circuits, you are wondering if an AI might attempt to convince people that it is stupid, in the hopes that we let down our guard so to speak.
2) To make matters even more meta, the statement is also questioning whether or not a robot would attempt to decieve us into thinkig it is stupid not through deeds(i.e. acting like a computer), but through masquerading as a human on a forum about video games and attempting to prove its stupidity in theory.
if im not mistaken that right there is a form of nuanced contingency planning, and its also reminiscient of what the poker crowd would call "leveling", i.e what if he thinks i think he thinks and so on.
Its also very paranoid, which in my opinion is one of our greatest intellectual assets..xD
My statement on the other hand is just a series of simple conclusions, based on the bit of data ive collected so far from poker and being an armchair general
As far as I am aware I am most certainly not a robot.
Unless you believe in simulation theory, in which case we are all AIs in one of many universe simulations that bored neckbeards are running in their futuristic basements in the year 13337...
(personally I just think Philip K. Dick did a wee bit too many amphetamines..the man was a genius but damn freelance writin be rough)
probably shouldnt judge, im high as fuck right now I hope im making sense