This is frankly a terrible attitude. You're basically prejudging hate speech before it's said. You're like an email filter trying to evaluate what someone is saying based on what heuristics trigger, and unwilling to examine someone beyond what cluster of internet arguments they might be parroting. Until someone says something, you can't attribute that to them.
No, it wasn't. Thanks for making my point about attacking what you think I'm saying rather than what I'm saying
I didn't blame the team, I said someone is out of sync with the others in terms of what's been said to me. I assume everyone N-1 on the moderation team is totally on the level and consistent