Sorbicol

Members
  • Content count

    258
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Sorbicol

  • Rank
    Thumb Citizen
  1. The Good Place is a fine comedy and I’ve really enjoyed watching it. However, it’s not a patch on Father Ted. That was required viewing when I was at university, the house would stop dead on a Friday evening until the show was finished (I’m from the UK) ‘Would you like another cup of tea father? ah go on go on go on go on go on go on go on go on go on go on go on go on go on go on go on go on’
  2. I find that idea really interesting - I think there is quite a lot in what you say too. The story in XCOM to me is fairly ephemeral - it doesn't touch on how I play the game much except where I need to get through the 'golden path' gates so that I don't lose the game. I hadnt really considered it like that. Might need to rethink a little!
  3. I think a lot of people - myself included - expected something much more inline with XCOM:EU than we got with XCOM2 on release. I know my criticisms of how information was disseminated in XCOM2 at launch matched those of Rob and Rowan, (especially for the strategic layer); however one (aborted) campaign later it was pretty clear to me what the differences were and what the change in approach should be. One of the issues with Firaxis reboot is that it is polished and balanced to the nth degree - most people used this to accuse the series of "dumbing down" on the original series. It really wasn't. While that's great, it does create the problem that having a 'bad' RNG roll could disproportionally impact your ability not only to complete that mission but also your campaign, as the consequences of failure were so much more dramatic than in the original X-COM series which treated your squaddies as cannon fodder, except for the lucky few to survive. XCOM:EU's counter to that - overwatch creep - led to a lot of (not without merit) accusations of dull gameplay. XCOM2's solution to that problem was just to add timers everywhere, which was fine but did occasionally leave your campaign progress entirely at the mercy of the RNG, and nothing at all to do with your tactical or strategic acumen at playing the game. Anyway i I digress a little, but there are so many levels of 'meta' (mostly obscure) to XCOM2 that aren't really apparent until you really think about. What I would say is that Firaxis's XCOM series is a series you to learn how to play on the easier difficulty levels before you can feel ready for the Classic or Commander/Ironman difficulty, which so clearly is the level the game is designed to be played at. Of course, that's a significant time investment to a lot of players, so I'm not surprised so many people walked away from it early on.
  4. I really enjoyed this episode - although I do find 3MA's relationship with Firaxis's XCOM series simultaneous enraging, amusing, irritating and thought provoking - I clearly do not see this game in the same terms as both Rob and Rowan do. I am constantly bemused by the assertion that XCOM is in any way an RPG - it really isn't. It's like saying that because you have to chose what cards you want to use in Star Wars: Battlefront (Something that you do need to think about a little depending on what map you are playing - but only a little) that Battlefront is some sort of Strategic FPS. Again, it isn't, it's just a fairly relaxed online shooter. The interplay in XCOM - especially XCOM2 - between the strategic and tactical layer is something that seems to get either misunderstood a lot - it's there very much, either in unlocking global areas so that you can reach blacksites, completing a tactical mission to slow down the Avatar timer, through to getting the right resource (something very much under explained when the game was first released to be sure) so that you are able to do the right things at the right time - these are things that are there clear as daylight. Once you've played the game beyond a couple of hours, well it's pretty evident how it all balances and how the strategic decisions you make in the global map should inform what missions you do or don't take. That "Meta" is the driver for the game - being good at it (or not) will inform your success just as much as how good you are at the tactical game. Calling the development of soldiers by unlocking abilities as they survive "RPG" shows a fundamental lack of understanding of what's happening at that layer - at least it does to me. Those abilities are necessary at the later stages of the game to be able to both counter some of the late game aliens (the HEAT ammo for heavy weapons springs to mind) and also be able to deal with the increased number of aliens you encounter. It's not a great leap from there to realise that not only do you need to be developing those skills, you need to be maintaining a big enough roster so that you can cope with the odd death and maintain your campaign should things go a little pear shaped. I know Rob sort of touched on that with your 2nd and 3rd string Snipers, but really, like Fraser says "you aren't playing it very well" if that's killing you off. There should be a cost to losing your top sniper, but it's one that you should be able to manage. Giving Soldiers names, and being able to customise them - yeah, that's RPG (sort of) but it's only really there for flavour given how much permadeath means to XCOM and it's inherent difficultly. If you lose that Colonel Heavy who's the only one you can soften up the Gatekeeper or Sectopod enough for everyone else to kill them, and not have someone to replace him - well, that's your fault for not considering your strategy enough. Yeah, there's a lot in XCOM 2 that isn't perfect (it's far too easy to leave the Avatar timer redundant later in the game) and some of the classes are much more powerful than others - Magus level Psi-Troopers are massively overpowered - but a lot of it is addressed in Long War 2 (a mod a 3MA discussion is long overdue for!) which both teases the game out at the Meta level, and also adds even more strategic and tactical decision making when you are developing your soldiers. I really like the look of War of the Chosen - they quite clearly have taken a lot of cues from Long War 2 and other games, ranging from Fire Embalm and Darkest Dungeon, all the way through to the Nemesis system in Shadow of Mordor. Having flame throwers etc in XCOM isn't just there for RPG flavour - setting fire to alien in XCOM has real tactical advantage - it leaves them unable to attack anything unless it's meelee, makes them panic and prevents them from throwing grenades or launching rockets - using abilities you really don't want them to be using- and deals damage over time. It is a crowd control mechanism as much as anything else. Flash bangs, posion and smoke grenades all have similar buff and debuff impacts at the tactical level - they are vital components in Long War 2, and it's great that Firaxis are bringing that to the vanilla game in their new expansion. It's not them being more "RPG"!!!!!!! Sorry this have now turned into a rant about XCOM. I really did enjoy this episode but I'm really not sure that you quite have XCOM right.....................
  5. Episode 394: Expeditions: Vikings

    I put something like 60 hours into Expeditions: Conquistadors, which I have to say I really enjoyed, limitations and all. However from this podcast I'm actually a little disappointed about Vikings. It sounds like it's basically the same game with almost the same structure - it doesn't sound like there is a lot of innovation going on. There was a massive "prologue" section in Conquistadors too - you spent the first 10-15 hours or so messing around on Cuba (where a corrupt local governor impounds your ship) before you get to head to South America. Mind you calling it a "prologue" is something of a disservice if I'm honest, it was essentially a game that had two settings - one section in Cuba, the other in Latin America & the Aztec Empire. I have to say though it does sound like there hasn't been much development of the Vikings over Conquistadors - the same balancing of you merry band of fellow travelers and their (either) outright capitalist racism slavery values, or their remarkably visionary views of liberal democracy and equality (given the times these games are set in) It's not that that really matters I guess, but many of the choices in Conquistadors were entirely arbitrary - you were going to upset someone no matter what you did. In the end you ended up sometimes being a nice, generous invader - helping the locals and treating them as equals, or other times being the raping pillaging invader so that you didn't lose that star hunter / musketeer, the only person in your expedition who could hit anything from range but was unfortunately a racist idiot. It took any immediacy from your decision making and ended up being more like a moral game of tetris - trying to act just to balance the different views of your expedition so nobody left, rather than role play who you wanted to be (after all, why compromise your expedition members if it leaves you materially worse off in game and left at a distinct disadvantage?) The combat in the game was always one of it's strongest point though - solid TBS although there were some scenarios I could never figure out how to beat in Conquistadors (I remember an ambush in a city - it was impossible to cover your retreat without being forced to split you forces, which just lead to you being over run, and others that were comically easy - even those camp ambushes happened with depressing regularity, on the same map, with the same enemies and an optimal strategy to defeat your attackers (once you'd figured it out) They even spawned in the same places each time............ Not sure what I think about Vikings now - probably a humble bundle purchase if I'm honest then.
  6. Elite: Dangerous (Kickstarter)

    Improvements to exploration can't come soon enough. The patience of those looking for the outposts in the Formadine Rift, Conflux and Hawking's Gap deserves from real praise. Or a call to the men in white coats................... It takes me 20 minutes to find anything on a planetary surface, and that's even when I know where it is.
  7. Elite: Dangerous (Kickstarter)

    Not that I think anyone else is interested, but on the official forums Michael Brooks (FDev Executive Producer) has admitted that the Ram Tah mission to scan the obelisks at the Ancient Ruins site is broken. Although in Open/Private group instances, not Solo like everyone thought it was. The upshot of that is that there are definitely other alien ruins out there (admittedly long suspected but now essentially confirmed), and at the moment people are getting far more scans out the ruins we know about than they should be. Leaving aside the fact that messing up something that important in game is really really poor quality control on FDev's part, it'll be interesting to see how else they handle it. Reset the mission? Whatever "clues" there are in game to working out the locations of the other ruins, nobody has hit upon it yet. And people have been analysing the Ruins since they were found. Mostly the canonn thread on the official forums is full of people grasping at straws. So if you do come across anything a little odd in game that talks about Guardians, rogue alien AI's or weird ruins with lots of geometric shapes in them or anything else, please flag it up!!!! Also the latest Alien Hyperdiction happened only 160Ly from Sol. That's inside the human bubble. War, War is coming........................
  8. XCOM 2

    Just started a new campaign and I've already borked the first mission not really understanding what it is I'm meant to be doing (i.e if you achieve your goal and need to get out then call that skyranger, because otherwise Advent will not play fair) Got some very interesting concepts in it, but you worry it's going to be a lot of busy work on the strategic screen later in the game.
  9. Elite: Dangerous (Kickstarter)

    Some of the actions to unlock the engineers are a little obtuse however. For example, Felicity Farseer asks for 1 unit of meta-alloys. They come from barnacles, so in order to get some you have to know where to look for barnacles, fly to the planet they are in, work out how to find the location on the planet, fly there, land, and hope that it's not already been harvested as they take a couple of weeks to regenerate. Don't forget to take an SRV either. None of the planets are in the bubble (although the Pleiades isn't that far away) Alternately you can fly to Darnelle's Progress in Maia and buy some, the only location in the game I'm aware that you can do so. Cost is about 120,000Cr per tonne. Just as well she only wanted the one. So so as you can see, the route to unlocking some of the engineers is a little convoluted. Also, most engineers only unlock when you become friendly enough with those you've already unlocked. Before then, you don't even know they exist.
  10. Elite: Dangerous (Kickstarter)

    Find a system in civil war (currently favourite is 17 Draconis) and stack massacre missions with one of the factions - each kill counts to each mission and, stacked, can earn you a lot of money very quickly indeed. It is really an exploit of how the game work at the moment, and you do have to go to conflict zones and pick a fight, so a very capable combat ship and knowledge of how to fly it are essential. On the other hand, you don't lose the missions if you do die, so it's not quite the end of the world. Assuming you can afford the rebuy costs of course. The knack to it is staying on the outskirts of the combat zone and only engaging against ships you know you can beat, or are too busy shooting at other NPC ships to fire back at you. The alien ruins mission from Ram Tah is bugged at the moment, so that's not the best option for 'quick' money. Plus it would seem there are more ruins out there to be found, and as yet nobody has figured out how to find them or where they might be.
  11. Elite: Dangerous (Kickstarter)

    When I started playing the game - slowly i think I was stuck with the starting sidewinder for about the first 20 hours or so first time I played the game, but that was near release. Now however the missions system is probably the place to start - start doing those to build reputation with local factions and you'll get offered better and better missions with better rewards. It can be a little frustrating, but it's your best option at the moment. It doesn't really matter if you support all the factions rather than just one or two. The data delivery missions are probably your best option as they don't require any cargo capacity. That should get get you enough to get started, as soon as you can afford a cobra the game will open up enormously.
  12. Civilisation 6

    I'm just nearing the final stages of my first serious campaign of Civ VI, playing as the Sumerians aiming, more or less, for a Scientific Victory. Like you I agree the game now has a lot more systems in it that are quite a lot to take in. The city and districts system in the main one I've struggled with a little, not so much with the concept of it but with recognising what a good placement for a district might be and when to concentrate you efforts. It strikes me that this is a method of forcing the player to consider city specialisation in a way Civ hasn't really done before. By and large I don't mind that too much although it isn't always immediately clear what would (or would not be) a good placement for a district, and future consideration of where to place neighbourhoods, for example, needs to be considered at the start of your city placement even though they are a late game mechanic. I do like the balance between housing and amenities as a replacement for unhappiness when managing your city populations - that feels a like a nicely balanced system (once I'd got my head around it) that doesn't feel half as arbitrary as population unhappiness did. Unlike Civ V this game clearly does not expect you to know what victory you want (although playing to your Civ's strengths is clearly still a factor) and it certainly gives you a lot more opportunities to get a feel for the lay of the land before picking a condition to aim for. That said I certainly get the impression that some victories are easier to achieve than others - a culture based Civ is probably going to struggle slightly to win anything other than a culture victory unless they are really trying. This is very much my feeling of what they have done as well - there is a ot more in this game to explore than there was in Vanilla Civ V that's for sure. The AI in my game been a little disappointing I have to say - it appears incapable of upgrading units at all (I still see some level 3 warrior units meandering around when I'm rocking mobile infantry and modern tanks, and that civ is capable of building it's own tanks) I've also had a couple of instances of Civ with whom I have maintained good relations throughout the game suddenly just declare war on me when their crossbowmen and knights don't have a hope in hell against my tanks and helicopters and bombers etc. It definitely still needs some work. I also very much dislike that you get excessive warmonger penalties when you are attacked and take city in retaliation (i.e, forcing the AI to surrender) - that needs to be sorted out. I can understanding taking a hit if you raze a city, but occupying one when you are not the aggressor should really shouldn't carry any penalty at all. All in all I've quite enjoyed it, there is plenty to explore and it feels a lot more polished than the last couple of Civ games at release. I also need to remember how to get to bed before 2am again!
  13. Sort of I think. Sorry I don't think I explained myself very well. At its core, Warhammer and 40K have always been, well, very British. Stop and think about 40K a little - the far future of humanity is phenomenally bleak with only the shining light of the all powerful Emperor holding back all the powers of darkness, while making sure all the little people know their place and get eradicated if they don't comply - oh and if they don't then the overwhelming powers of chaos will consume them. Given the time period when 40K was being created, that's an allegory for the political situation in the UK during the 1980s with Thatcher's conservative government. OK it's taking it to an absolute extreme and stretches it almost to breaking point, but that's more or less where a lot of 40K comes from. However, in spite of everything it was always with tongue firmly in cheek and a general acknowledgement that the bleakness of the 40K universe really shouldn't be taken all that seriously. My issue with DoW2 (which is an excellent game) is that it takes itself and the Space Marines far too seriously. None of the levity, or the knowing self awareness of just how ridiculous the Space Marines actually are is missing. When I played 40K back in the day the emphasis was always that the Space Marines were the elite of the elite and only when into battle when all else had failed - it was the teeming masses of humanity through the imperial guard that did the bulk of the fighting and dying so that the Emperor could survive. All that fighting and dying and sacrifice so one dude in a golden throne life support system could be kept alive, and they couldn't let die because if they did ships could not navigate the warp. It's basically taking the p**s.. All the best GW games have kept that rather irreverent tone (Although I do think that it's much easier for Bloodbowl to do that given the setting) and the worst are the ones that take them selves way too seriously. The mechanics of the game and how well they work are almost - almost - completely incidental to how good the game actually is. Warhammer to me has lost a great deal of that and it's much to it's detriment. Then again, I was playing the wargames and space hulk and bloodbowl way back in the late 80s / early 90s, so it's probably something Warhammer hasn't really had in a very long time and I'm just being overly nostalgic every time I come back to a GW based video game.
  14. Ahhhh Warhammer. I really enjoyed this episode thank you all, although I must admit the lip service paid to Bloodbowl (a game doing XCOM long before XCOM was even a tinkle in Julian Gallop's eye, let alone Firaxis) was a little disappointing. It is still just about the greatest game that Games Workshop ever came up with. There are, and have been quite a few great Warhammer games but other than Bloodbowl I think I've ever really played one that captures the very essence of what Warhammer is and what it means to those gamers "of a certain age". Some of that, which I think Fraser was trying to get to in some of his comments, is the Cultural Impact of Games Workshops over here in the UK. I'm an old school Warhammer player, and I mean Old school. The first Warhammer game I got involved in was Warhammer Fantasy Battle, second edition. That was purchased with my Brother, sometime in the mid1980s from Hamley's Toy shop on Regent Street of all places. Anyway, I digress - Unfortunately for my Brother I was a little too young to fully grasps the tactical and strategic nuances needed to play it at that time (when it was much more of a war game than a hero RPG with some extra units thrown in simulator that it is now) but I enjoyed it, enjoyed painting the miniatures and meant D&D never meant anything to me (and many many more legions of British geek adolescents either). That led me to Warhammer 40K: Rogue trader, Adeptus Titanicus, Epic and then to what is still GWs other best games, Necromunda and Space Hulk. It was - and probably still is - the defacto non-computer based role playing game(s) that everyone this side of the Atlantic defaults to playing. There was a thread of social commentary running throughout all of GWs games - a very 80s one admittedly but considering current world politics is becoming much more relevant again - that it just about still retains in 40K. I can't speak for the fantasy version any more though having not touched it in a very long time, certainly long before the Age of Sigmar reboot. To me the games based in that Universe have always worked best when they have that ideal front and centre - it's something Dawn of War just about had (and DoW 2 lost) Bloodbowl has in spades, and has always been sadly missing from the Space Hulk games. I only played the Space Marine Demo even though the actual gameplay was lacking it felt like Warhammer 40K to me. It's something I look for specifically in GW based games, and no matter how good the gameplay mechanics are, it's never going to be a Warhammer game if it's not there. It's that reverence to the Universe that GW have created that makes a game a Warhammer game to me - the gameplay can be as solid as you like, but if it takes itself too seriously (like DoWII) then, to me at least, it isn't a Warhammer game. Otherwise it's just a game set in the Warhammer universe. I don't believe the focus on Hero units has ever served the games of GW well, board or video which was always clearly a decision based on their bottom line. Warhammer 40K and Fantasy Battle were once excellent war games that, if someone were allowed to, could be excellent strategy video games using the old rulesets (at this point I admit I've not played Total Warhammer, mostly due to my ambivalence towards Total War as a series). Most of all, I would love to see Necromunda as some sort of XCOM style strategy game with a persistent gang, tactical TBS missions to gain influence over the city slums by holding or losing territory across a strategic map. That would be quite excellent, it's a shame Mordheim hasn't really been able to carry that off at a fantasy level which is what I think it was trying to do.
  15. Elite: Dangerous (Kickstarter)

    Looks like FD are considering some fairly substantial changes to ships and combat as part of the beta they are currently running: Ship changes which looks to be beefing up trading ships a little so they are no longer made out of tissue paper, and additional slots to Military craft so that they can take advantage of the Experimental shield changes they are proposing.