Nick Posted March 10, 2005 nah, I bet the Xbox2 will be fantastic That bloke scares me http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/4335481.stm Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
netmonkey Posted March 11, 2005 I wanted Microsoft to call it the "YBOY", or an increase in the letter X (Y, Z...)... but of course, the Microsoft marketing department probably thinks that it's not cool if doesn't have three hip-hop artists behind it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Salka Posted March 11, 2005 Why does everything have to be called 2 today? Because they're the second ones. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DanJW Posted March 11, 2005 I wanted Microsoft to call it the "YBOY", or an increase in the letter X (Y, Z...)... but of course, the Microsoft marketing department probably thinks that it's not cool if doesn't have three hip-hop artists behind it. The Z-Boz? I like it! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
loonyboi Posted March 11, 2005 Why does everything have to be called 2 today? It won't be. I don't know what it will be called, but it won't be Xbox 2. That would make it sound inferior to the PlayStation 3. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Nick Posted March 11, 2005 Microsoft is saving the official unveiling of the Xbox 2, codenamed Xenon Probably something rubbish like Xenon Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
teh_Ubermensch Posted March 11, 2005 Great. So the big development is that Live features such as buddy lists, and music playlists (hard disk required, RRP £99.99) are now controlled at chip level. Well excuse me whilst I don't piss myself with excitement. Surely seeing as these features were mentioned even before the first Xbox was originally launched (and it wouldn't exactly have been hard to incorporate them on to the Xbox dashboard), they should have already been there in the first place. So far Microsoft have promised: no hard disk, no HD-DVD, they won't commit to backwards compatibility, the inclusion of features already in most games (but OMG at chip level!), and an improved processor and GPU. Great... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
netmonkey Posted March 11, 2005 No backward compatibility? That's ironic, because Microsoft Windows is the #1 embracer of suporting everything ever made for the PC, which of course, makes it an overbloated piece of shit... maybe Microsoft has learned their lesson after all. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites