jaybles

Members
  • Content count

    2
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by jaybles


  1. I understand the trepidation of dying in a Souls game and the idea that it doesn't respect your time. But I have the opposite reaction, that other games don't respect my intelligence.

     

    Demon's Souls took off because it came out in a period where the triple-A video game on consoles hit a wall. By 2009 the costs had risen so exponentially, team sizes hitting the multi-hundreds, and all the big hits of '05-'07 became annualized. Death was inconsequential, lengthy tutorials dominated the opening sections, and everything was designed with a big neon GO HERE sign because no developer could afford to create content the player wouldn't see.

     

    Demon's Souls was a rejection of that. It's a game that holds your hand for the length of its tutorial then rips off the floaties and tosses you in the deep end. It's not a hard game in the same way as Meat Boy or even Crushing Uncharted. It's completely uncaring about mistakes. There are some unfair moments, the devs can't catch them all, but when people say "when you die it's your fault" holds true at least 90% of the time as nearly every death is a result of me getting cocky, experimenting when I shouldn't, or rushing an enemy. Sometimes you have to run away but modern design has hammered that out of us. 

     

    I do agree some of the community can be mean and impenetrable. It's difficult to criticize this game as it stands alone in what it does but it isn't helped by responding to every criticism with "git gud."


  2. his is long, rambly, and I had to walk away for a couple of hours and came back mid thought. I'm asking how we get to a place where we praise and criticize mechanically superior games with aesthetic issues in the same way we do for games that are mechanically flawed. How do we recognizes MGS for its technical excellence without allowing it to walk away scot free at the end of the year? Should I care?

     

    Video games are largely about interaction. Presentation is important but interaction is the vehicle by which we experience them. If they were hands off they'd be animated movies.  MGS has been criticized on the same level as more mechanically flawed games but it gets a pass because it's enjoyable to play. Unless the presentation is particularly egregious then the average person will make concessions to continue experiencing the thing they're largely enjoying, problematic or not.

     

    We change things by talking about it, calling out poor examples and praising good ones. Developers adapt to their environment and the younger generation that grew up in this environment will end up developing games in their own image so the best you can do is promote a positive one.