grobstein

Members
  • Content count

    3
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by grobstein


  1. I am so intrigued by this series. It sounds like Red Dragon is the wrong place to get on board. 

     

    Does it still make sense to get Airland Battle? This is a multiplayer series, right -- will the multiplayer action shift over to Red Dragon, making Airland Battle worthless? Or on the other hand are lots of people going to continue playing Airland Battle?


  2. For those interested in the cut metagame, I posted a video of it:

    I added some annotation popups so it's not completely stupefying.

    Wow, that metagame video is completely stupefying!

    Great show, all, and what a coup to get Brendon Chung on. I love Atom Zombie Smasher and Flotilla and maybe I'll check out those other titles some day.

    Make more strategy games, Brendon!


  3. That's a really interesting and important observation. I'm exactly the same way. In fact, I even tend to horde items or mana in RPGs, "just in case." It's only when I'm fighting the last boss that I realize that I probably could have been a bit less frugal.

    As a designer I wonder if there's a way to encourage horders to actually use the cool stuff they have. Maybe it's just a difficulty issue, where if you're able to get by without needing them then you just don't see the point in 'wasting' something.

    - Jon

    We actually discussed this issue a little bit over here -- in that thread, poster after poster "confesses" to hoarding the strong recovery items in games like Final Fantasy, never using them. They're a wasted mechanic.

    Players are leaving options like strong recovery items on the table, and favoring other ways of getting through challenges -- basically, grinding for power levels that allow you to ignore recovery items. The irony is that these same players might complain about the necessity of grinding.

    From a game design perspective, one form of answer is to give players a behavioral "nudge" towards more interesting solutions to gameplay challenges, away from the boring path of least resistance. A case study from the RPG context: I've been playing Persona 3 Portable (which is fantastic), and often find myself reaching for powerful recovery items, including Soma, which is the equivalent of Final Fantasy's Megalixir. P3 takes a number of measures to make grinding less attractive compared to the alternatives: whenever you go into the dungeon to grind, it takes up in-game time you could be using to pursue social links; if you fight too much, you will be "Tired" the next day and face gameplay penalties; you can almost never grind safely, because easy monsters give hyperbolically discounted XP rewards, hard monsters are dangerous, and there are no save points to camp at, and out-of-dungeon recovery is expensive. These features tweak players' incentives and help them rely less on grinding and more on systems that might be neglected otherwise, like the recovery items.

    It's fair to think about it as a difficulty issue, but more importantly not all solutions to a difficult problem are equal. If a difficult boss can be dealt with either by 1) grinding or 2) tactical use of recovery items, we might find that 1) is the default solution people will choose if allowed, whereas 2) might be much more interesting if players are encouraged to try it.